Comments on: Review: Good Will Hunting (1997) http://www.cjc.org/blog/archives/1999/06/22/review-good-will-hunting-1997/ Sun, 26 Sep 2010 03:06:45 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.8 By: Babette http://www.cjc.org/blog/archives/1999/06/22/review-good-will-hunting-1997/comment-page-1/#comment-167506 Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:27:09 +0000 /?p=53#comment-167506 I’m 90 years old and saw “Good Will Hunting” for the first time last night and wanted to know more about its background. The combination of the review and the comments was very helpful and interesting.

]]>
By: Cheng http://www.cjc.org/blog/archives/1999/06/22/review-good-will-hunting-1997/comment-page-1/#comment-157776 Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:35:48 +0000 /?p=53#comment-157776 Yes, I suck at spelling and should proof read.

]]>
By: steve http://www.cjc.org/blog/archives/1999/06/22/review-good-will-hunting-1997/comment-page-1/#comment-157769 Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:47:55 +0000 /?p=53#comment-157769 speaking of proper spelling, what in the world is “counsoling”?
i actually like it a lot
i suppose it’s for therapists that counsol the patients they are counseling

]]>
By: Shoye http://www.cjc.org/blog/archives/1999/06/22/review-good-will-hunting-1997/comment-page-1/#comment-48632 Tue, 27 Mar 2007 04:01:01 +0000 /?p=53#comment-48632 Had to watch this for a psych grad class. Wretch! I agree, the film is almost unbearable untill William’s understated, real performance. The cartoonish set up of the film is almost unbearable. And, of course, we all know that teachin at a community college is a fate worse than eternal damnation!

Thanks for the insightful review. his is Hollywood pablum, and shouldn’t be given a fucking Oscar nomination. Oops, what did I say, it desreves it because it is!

]]>
By: Cheng-Jih Chen http://www.cjc.org/blog/archives/1999/06/22/review-good-will-hunting-1997/comment-page-1/#comment-467 Mon, 02 May 2005 20:51:40 +0000 /?p=53#comment-467 Thanks for the correction — spelling is not my strong suit. Also, my short time in grad school was in many ways a lifetime before I wrote this movie review, and I was not on the applied math side of things.

I think you haven’t read clearly about what I’m saying about the urban legend based on Dantzig. I know full well the factual basis of the legend, and follow up with a piece of math folklore featuring Dantzig and von Neumann (which I had heard a degree of separation away from Dantzig’s retelling of his story). What I’m pointing out are reasons why the urban legend — which differs from the actual story in important ways and makes factual errors — propagates and gets retold, as, in this example, a Hollywood movie.

I never say Dantzig didn’t do what he did. I’m saying that the UL, which is about “impossible” things being accomplished by bright neophytes who have yet to be jaded by the world, isn’t the real story, and the variations from the real story (which you kindly gave a link to) are interesting in themselves.

]]>
By: John http://www.cjc.org/blog/archives/1999/06/22/review-good-will-hunting-1997/comment-page-1/#comment-466 Mon, 02 May 2005 19:18:03 +0000 /?p=53#comment-466 What arrogant nonsense.

So you went to grad school for math, did you, and you can’t even spell the name of the famous mathematician whose reputation you are slamming on?

It is not “Danzig,” it is “Dantzig.” The legend that you so arrogantly rip on as false, isn’t.

From DanTzig’s own words: “During my first year at Berkeley I arrived late one day to one of Neyman’s classes. On the blackboard were two problems which I assumed had been assigned for homework. I copied them down. A few days later I apologized to Neyman for taking so long to do the homework – the problems seemed to be a little harder to do than usual. I asked him if he still wanted the work. He told me to throw it on his desk. I did so reluctantly because his desk was covered with such a heap of papers that I feared my homework would be lost there forever.

About six weeks later, one Sunday morning about eight o’clock, Anne and I were awakened by someone banging on our front door. It was Neyman. He rushed in with papers in hand, all excited: “I’ve just written an introduction to one of your papers. Read it so I can send it out right away for publication.” For a minute I had no idea what he was talking about. To make a long story short, the problems on the blackboard which I had solved thinking they were homework were in fact two famous unsolved problems in statistics. That was the first inkling I had that there was anything special about them.”

http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Dantzig_George.html

Regards,

John

]]>
By: Movie Posters Archives http://www.cjc.org/blog/archives/1999/06/22/review-good-will-hunting-1997/comment-page-1/#comment-193 Sat, 20 Nov 2004 05:15:31 +0000 /?p=53#comment-193 Good Will Hunting
Good Will Hunting The reason why I respect great producers Bob & Harvey Weinstein, founders of Miramax, is because of their incredible skill to evaluate film scripts. They seem to understand not only which script can earn big money, but…

]]>